Chung Chieh(揭仲) provided an example, stating that the P&A data is equivalent to a quotation submitted by potential vendors, while the LOA draft is the contract draft during formal negotiations between the two parties. Both sides can negotiate the items, amounts, and payment milestones in the LOA draft before finalizing and signing it. Once the LOA is signed, the U.S. government will represent the purchasing country in subsequent processes such as vendor selection, negotiation, production, and delivery.
The advantage of this system is that the U.S. government will execute project management for the purchasing country; however, the downside is that it excludes certain clauses found in general commercial contracts, such as dispute resolution and arbitration mechanisms, primarily to facilitate the operations of U.S. administrative departments.
He noted that prior to Tsai Ing-wen’s administration, the U.S. insisted that Taiwan’s military procurement procedures must begin with a request for P&A. If the U.S. agreed to provide P&A, it would signify interdepartmental review and consent to sell. Taiwan would then plan its budget and apply for the LOR for LOA based on the P&A. However, since 2016, the U.S. has allowed Taiwan to skip the P&A stage and directly apply for the LOA draft when necessary.
He interpreted that the M1A2T budget exceeding nearly 5 billion NTD is due to the Army’s procurement process for the M1A2T, which aimed to expedite the project by skipping the LOR for P&A stage and relying on price data previously presented in a military exchange meeting. This approach overlooked significant price fluctuations over the years without obtaining a formal quotation, resulting in an underestimated budget. (圖片擷取自聯合報數位版)
/https://vip.udn.com/vip/story/121160/9544803?from=vipudn_maincate_main2
主持人:淡大戰略所副教授 林穎佑 博士
來 賓:國防安全研究院國防戰略資源所副研究員揭仲 博士
(圖片擷取自 鏡新聞 Youthbe)
在軍售「發價書」標準條款中,不僅不存在「罰則」,還載明「任何歧見,必須由雙方政府協商,不得將其交由國際法庭或第三者解決」。這些標準條款,使我方無法如一般商業合約,能依照遲交情形,要求主合約商支付罰金,也不能透過提起訴訟或送交商業仲裁。
軍售的付款本質上屬於「預收款」,確保美國國防部在代替採購國執行專案管理的過程中,能有穩定、足夠的財源,與全案實際執行進度並無直接關聯。事實上,美國國防部是等全案結案時,才會仔細核算採購國實際應支付的金額,並提供最終帳單。
在軍售「發價書」的標準條款中,不存在SOSA或RDP條款這二個機制,必須由雙邊政府另外簽署相關協議才能適用,但我方都不在其中。
國防部更應緊盯在延遲交運期間,合約商有無將解決問題過程中所新增、卻不應歸責於我方的支出,計入向我方收取的價款內;若發現這種情形,應比照長程預警雷達的先例,發函美國國防部提出抗議,並爭取退款。(圖片擷取自風傳媒網頁)
近期迴響